🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that may create up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries established after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action occurs during a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A senior Democratic leader said the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.