🔗 Share this article

An informant has revealed the Afghan leak inquiry that the UK failed to secure sensitive technology allowing the militant group to identify Afghans who collaborated with allied troops.

Data Breach Endangers Numerous at Risk

The source, called Person A, stated that Afghans affected by the data leak were instructed to relocate and change their contact details to avoid detection from the Taliban.

MPs are currently examining the Conservative government's handling of a catastrophic breach of personal details concerning approximately 19k Afghans who had applied to relocate to the UK to escape the regime.

Data Disclosure Was Discovered

A spreadsheet with their personal data, comprising identities, contact details and sometimes household data, was mistakenly released by a staff member working at UK special forces headquarters in last year.

The incident became known only in August 2023, when identities of nine people who had applied to settle in Britain were posted on Facebook.

Regime's Resources

“There seems to be this misconception that Afghan rulers lack similar capabilities that western nations possess,” the whistleblower testified to lawmakers.

Technology was deserted in Afghanistan; they have it. Should they obtain your phone number, they can trace your exact position. This is exactly how specialized teams achieved.”

When questioned about whether the Taliban had access to sophisticated technology, the whistleblower declared: “They possess all resources.”

Consequences of the Data Breach

Early investigations submitted to the committee indicated that at least 49 relatives and colleagues of people concerned by the leak had been executed.

A superinjunction about the leak was put in force in last year and blocked all details regarding the matter from being made public until July 2025.

Security Recommendations

Because she was restricted, Person A and the non-governmental organization she was working with advised affected households they were assisting that they had “apprehensions that certain devices had been breached”.

“We recommended that they change residence when possible and altered their mobile numbers. These represented the two main details that, should militant forces acquired this information, would result in their location being found,” Person A explained.

Disputed Conclusions

Person A contested that internal investigation performed by a retired civil servant had been mistaken to determine that the possession of the dataset by the regime was “unlikely to substantially change an individual's existing exposure”.

“The crucial point is that these individuals are not standing up to the authorities; they live secretly. Everything boils down to their previous employment.”

Person A described terrible violence experienced by affected individuals, involving electric shock torture, simulated drowning, and severe beatings.

“There are cases of four-year-old children who have had their arms broken to force the family to reveal locations,” the whistleblower revealed.